[ad#468x60]Most companies and business assume that the best way to promote their product and services is by creating hype. This is far from true. Each business needs to analyze pros and cons of what they are offering before they go ahead and create a marketing strategy. A fast paced wide coverage might garner great results for one but the same might not be true for the other business. Hype marketing isn’t the smartest option when it comes to marketing.
The reason I chose this subject today is due to the meaningless hype created by the new search engine cuil, pronounced “cool.” This so called “Google’s rival search engine” was launched on July 27th 2008. Right after its launch, anywhere you went on the web you could see cuil being talked about as the next big thing in search engines. Some of the thing that caught most users attention was the fact that it had 120 billion pages indexed and the company said that the search results were better than that produced by google. No wonder everyone was talking about the new “to be search giant.” Techcrunch, Cnet, ZDnet, Nytimes, Silicon….no matter where you went there was Cuil being talked about. Well, the hype was meaningless. It has nothing extraordinary to offer the way the company promoted itself.
Being talked about alone doesn’t produce results. Positive results come from positive user experience. One day or so later we could see Cuil all over the web again. The only difference now was that it wasn’t being talked about as the next big thing. Most users found that the searches were not even close to what they were looking for.
I am glad they created as much hype as they did. It certainly wasn’t good for them and their first impression is down the drain among search engine users. However, this certainly is a great case study for marketers and a lesson to learn. They made a mistake, a huge one at that and we need to learn from it.
Hype is good when you know you are promoting something that can live upto what you are making people to expect. Hype is worse when you say one thing and the results are totally the other way around. As of this point I think Cuil has totally wrecked it’s reputation. Just cause it was created by an ex – google engineer doesn’t make it worthy of all the attention, cheap attention for that matter.
If you want to promote your product and services, think. Some products and services require creating hype for attention and some need slow and gradual promotion. In case of Cuil, they should have launched a private beta giving access to as many users as possible. People would talk about it and there would certainly be some promotion as most beta users would bring it to the general web population.
I am sorry to say but Cuil’s marketing approach hit everything else but the nail. So next time you think about creating a hype, remember not all products and services do good with hype marketing. Sometimes gradual marketing is the best way to go. Hype works well when you everything you say about your product or service is true. In Cuil’s case it seem like they deliberately tried to mislead users to try their service with inaccurate information.
Marketing isn’t about gaining mere attention. It is about conveying message to your potential customers/users on how they can actually benefit from your product or service. Creating hype with misleading information will do nothing but create a bad impression and nothing else.
Thanks for the lesson Cuil![ad#336x280]
Facebook comments:
Powered by Facebook Comments




{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }
I tried Cuil and searched for my blog (20smoney.com) and couldn’t even find it!
Imagine that! My internationally recognized brand of 20smoney wasn’t found! (I’m kidding).
Great post on hype marketing though. I totally agree with your message.
Kevins last blog post..Is Investing In Battered-Down Iconic Brands A Good Investment Strategy?
Cuil certainly managed to get a lot of attention quickly, but I’ve never been one to agree that all press is good press. You’re not going to accomplish much by being notoriously useless.
Colins last blog post..What’s the deal with Cuil?
Amen! Not only was cuil.com’s launch utterly disappoint and completely overhyped; I found that due to server overload I couldn’t perform searches for the first few days. Additionally, and as you correctly pointed out, many of the searches I performed didn’t even come close to giving accurate results.
The other issue that I would like to take, and probably a bit off-topic for this marketing blog, is with Cuil’s design. The 2 and three column search result page design not only makes it difficult to find what you’re looking for, it flies in the face of tried and true methods.
It’s great to try and be something different. But carefully weigh whether or not your users are so familiar with a competitors product or service that they simply will not “get” your approach.
I’m sorry, but I couldn’t disagree with this post more. Sure, Cuil didn’t live up to certain individuals expectations, and I DO agree that ‘Positive results come from positive user experience’, but think about how much money they saved on Marketing. Their viral approach may have not been a feasible solution for you, but economically, for them, was ideal. Pertaining to their services, sure, it could of been slightly better, but as for marketing to their demographic(s), it was a complete success and did stirr up a lot of buzz. I feel that “word of mouth” marketing is underestimated and the exponential potential can be groundbreaking for new startups, especially online. I understand that due to their service being “less than all the hype expected”, that they are open to criticism. Honestly though, they’re in Beta, they WILL make changes, and as much as you say they ruined their opportunity, their name is now “out there”. People will be interested when Cuil makes their next move.
Rebuttal?
@ Tom : I still think it was a wrong approach to marketing. Yes, they did get their name out there but what’s the point of marketing a service to so extreme that it doesn’t live upto expectation? Also I see the point that they are in beta, this is why I suggested they should have launched a private beta first and got some feedback, before heading out as Google’s competitor.
The saying ” First impression is also the last impression ” might come true in this case. If you have been following the blogosphere, you probably know about Blogrush. They created such a hype and the fact that John Reese was the founder created so much expectation but they failed to live upto that. Where is Blogrush now?
@ Ritu:
I’m not disagreeing with your post, but none of this would be an issue if their service DID live up to expectation. In face, I would be bold enough to say that their marketing tactics would be praised in its efficiency. I know expectations were not met by many consumers, but if they were, I don’t think individuals would be criticizing a very cost-affordable and underestimated marketing attempt.
in fact*, not in face
…
Sorry, early!
I’ve tried Cuil but it doesn’t even come close to Google’s quality. I was disappointed because after al the things they said about Cuil I really thought it was better.
But okay, Google is a damn complex engine, you just can’t build a better one overnight. That’s just not feasible.
I tried Cuil and was very disappointed. I mean, what kind of a search engine can’t even return itself as a result?
Pauls last blog post..Tips on receiving a quality letter of recommendation